Adopted and emerging policy
How the Adopted Borough Plan Review and New Local Plan Affect Land Valuation
The Borough Plan Review 2021–2039 was adopted in December 2025. Its spatial strategy, allocations, settlement boundaries and development-management policies carry full development-plan weight. Land allocated for development, or land needed to deliver an allocated site, may have a materially different planning and commercial position from unallocated land outside the defined urban area.
The new Local Plan is being prepared because the adopted housing requirement does not meet the relevant future housing-need threshold under the new plan-making system. The council’s June 2026 scoping report referred to a minimum need of 750 homes a year, 37% above the adopted requirement of 545. That does not mean every submitted site will be required, but it is an important reason why fresh land evidence is being assembled so soon after adoption.
The correct valuation approach is to identify which planning stage creates the opportunity. A site may already benefit from an adopted allocation; it may be capable of a policy-compliant application; it may need to be assessed through the new Local Plan; or it may require a longer-term strategy because access, infrastructure, Green Belt or environmental constraints cannot yet be resolved.
The summer 2026 Call for Sites has closed
The council invited sites of at least 0.25 hectares for housing, employment, retail and social infrastructure between 29 June and 10 August 2026. Sites submitted in the 2024 Call for Employment Sites or summer 2025 Call for Sites did not need to be resubmitted unless an alternative use was sought; older historic submissions needed to be resubmitted to be considered going forward. Inclusion in the process is evidence gathering only and does not amount to an allocation or permission.
Preparing for the next evidence consultation
The Local Plan timetable anticipates consultation on proposed plan content and evidence between 28 June and 9 August 2027. For a landowner who missed the 2026 submission window, the practical task is to establish whether another site-submission route becomes available and, in the meantime, prepare a proportionate evidence pack. That may include a clear red-line boundary, ownership and availability confirmation, indicative capacity, access appraisal, flood-risk screening, ecology and landscape review, infrastructure considerations and an explanation of why the site would support the emerging spatial strategy.